Communicator (communicator) wrote,

Burnt Norton (ii)

The first 84 words set out a general philosophical position - the utter non-existence of everything except the narrow intense present. The next 23 words give a concrete example of the theory in practice, and a metaphor:
My words echo
Thus, in your mind.
But to what purpose
Disturbing the dust on a bowl of rose-leaves
I do not know.

In these 23 words Eliot is saying that his act of composing the words of Burnt Norton is, by the time you read this, part of the destroyed past. His words only exist in the mind of you, whoever you are, who happen to be reading this poem in this microsecond of time. Conversely from his point of view you, reading this, are just a vague potential in the abyss of non-existence that lies in front of him. So the poem is a message from a destroyed man to a reader who does not exist. The bowl of dusty old rose leaves seems to make the words you read the dried husks of a living act of creation, now long dead, and the listless breeze of your attention just lifts them momentarily in a parody of life.

The first time I wrote about Burnt Norton egretplume said it 'reminds me of the SF world of alternate realities'. I agree. I think Burnt Norton is very much like SF. It says to you 'Look - the real universe is extremely peculiar and rather dreadful. The conventional model you have of existence is not only quite dull, but completely wrong.'

The dried rose leaves are also a bridge into the next section which is about walking into the living rose garden at Burnt Norton.

  • Phew what a scorcher

    I see Gove has backed down on climate change and it's back in the curriculum again.

  • GCSE Computer Science

    My book is now for sale

  • LJ Settings

    At the moment I have set up this journal so that only friends can comment. I hate doing this, but I was just getting too much Russian spam.

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic