November 19th, 2008
|10:33 pm - The Devil's Whore|
The new Civil War drama started tonight. You wouldn't have guessed it was by the writer of 'Our Friends in the North': I enjoyed it well enough, and I didn't think it was a travesty or anything. Just a jolly old romp, really, with good actors and high production values.
ETA John Simm was cool
|Date:||November 19th, 2008 11:35 pm (UTC)|| |
I enjoyed it too; it's great to see such quality in the midst of all the usual dross.
I thought Peter Capaldi was particularly good as Charles I. He even looked like him.
It was very compressed - a few times I looked away for a few seconds and the war had progressed by several months
It was a funny old programme: very compressed as you said, wildly different tones to the individual parts, generally unintelligble dialogue.
I'm surprised there haven't been more modern dramas set during the civil war. It seems largely untapped. (Although I think Peter Watkins did a one?)
There was the film 'To Kill a King' about Cromwell having a crush on Fairfax (Tim Roth and Dougray Scott) which was absurd IMHO. It also had a politically difficult and impetuous Royalist upper-class wife, but she was more annoying and spoiled than Fanshawe in this.
The tone was very changeable - in some parts it seemed like an historical romance, and it seems to be setting itself up to be 'Wicked Lady'. But I thought the actors were great.
|Date:||November 20th, 2008 07:13 am (UTC)|| |
I did think of watching, but with re-runs of The Detectives on Paramount 2.....
But the big question is - Are you going to change your icon now he has thrown in the towel?
I don't think he has thrown in the towel. He's flounced off the floor, whirling the towel round his head, dropping heavy hints that he'd have won if he hadn't had better things to do.
|Date:||November 21st, 2008 08:14 am (UTC)|| |
Certainly not - he justified the caption in the manner of his leaving!
Might not bother watching any more, though. I'd like Tom or Austin to win but I'm not that bothered....
I liked Nancy Banks-Smith's review
this morning: "It is flatteringly well written and acted; they know we usually settle for much less."
That must have been where I got the 'Wicked Lady' idea from too.
|Date:||November 20th, 2008 05:09 pm (UTC)|| |
I had to choose between this, "Heroes" and "Picture Books". This didn't win - although "Heroes" is teetering on the edge of being abandoned.
"Picture Books" was glorious though!
Yes, great show, I've been watching it with my kids, I think it's on Saturday night
I faintly thought that it was an over-extended 'Big Train' sketch that never quite reached the punchline.
Tip to actors. If you're going to wear a sword, spend a little time learning how to walk with it on.
Now you are being harsher than me. What did you think of Apparitions this week? (I didn't watch it)
I am, yes! :-) Although, actually, I thought it was fine - encouraging to see Channel 4 produce a decent drama for the first time in years. Of course, it has to have 'Whore" in the title to get past their schedulers :D
Apparitions this week - I think I was right in terms of what they are trying to do with it. They've also got a *real* POV character for us (a police woman), and you can see how the other factions fall into varying degrees of fantasy (including our ostensible hero). The difficulty, I think, is with the difficulty of the material (this two parter ended up in a holocaust narrative), and it is therefore walking a tightrope which, for many viewers, it will fall off repeatedly.