Communicator (communicator) wrote,

If I could see it with your eyes

edblog links to an article by Harold Bloom decrying Stephen King, JK Rowling, and more or less everyone else.

I think Harold fails to trust us enough. I am remined of my friend Harriet's suggestion that when we feel a passion for a work (she was referring to Blakes 7) we fall in love with the platonic ideal of that work, which the artefact itself merely points at, or hints at. I agree with her, and I think other fans of the same work may see the same ideal as we do, and their enthusiasm or their fanfiction or their critiques may help us to see that ideal-behind-the mask more clearly.

A broken statue may suggest to you an intact work of beauty that never existed. And I do not doubt that people achieve the sublime state that Harold wants us to feel, by using massively flawed and broken works as hints of something greater behind them, things that perhaps no single work of art can ever match.

  • Phew what a scorcher

    I see Gove has backed down on climate change and it's back in the curriculum again.

  • GCSE Computer Science

    My book is now for sale

  • LJ Settings

    At the moment I have set up this journal so that only friends can comment. I hate doing this, but I was just getting too much Russian spam.

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic