Communicator (communicator) wrote,

Going postal

So, B in my office received his postal ballot paper a couple of days ago. It is the worst. It's a massive piece of paper, that you have to tear into two still quite big pieces. You have to vote on one piece, in private, and then you have to assert your identity on the other piece, in front of a witness, who also has to sign. There are two envelopes: you have to put the voting page into one envelope, properly folded so that the bar code shows in the window, and seal it; then you put the voting envelope and the completed identity sheet (again folded in a particular way) into the other envelope. The two envelopes are different colours, and you have to get them the right way round.

My concern about the postal vote is not the complexity of the process (though it is nonsense) but the lack on control and anonymity. I think it reduces what should be a proud moment to a farce, and it allows bossy people to take control of the other votes in their household: I'm certain that will happen. I also think more widespread ballot-theft and fraud is fairly likely. Even if it doesn't happen, it's a plausible story that anyone losing can put about.

All in all a disaster for democracy.

B decided that he wanted to protest about the voting procedure more than he wanted to vote for any of the candidates, so he spoiled his ballot paper with a complaint, and faxed his MP to tell him what he had done. I hope a lot of people do that kind of thing.

For myself, I haven't decided how to vote yet.
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic