Communicator (communicator) wrote,
Communicator
communicator

art for art's sake

I hope I'm not posting too much - I'm going out into the sunshine in a minute. I think you might like these versions of famous artworks with clothes added.



There are several galleries of these and they are definitely worth a look

http://www.w1k.com/cache/gallery/contestcache.asp?contest_id=556
http://www.w1k.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=1066
http://www.worth1000.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=1966
http://www.worth1000.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=2434
http://www.worth1000.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=2872

How come some of them look sexier with their clothes on? Even thought they have perfect bodies? Or perhaps I'm just revealing myself as an old lecher art connoisseur.



Actually, this one is sexier in its original form
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 4 comments