The Ex-Communicator

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> User Info
> previous 20 entries

June 30th, 2009


12:07 pm - Holiday and Separation Anxiety
I'm going to Brittany for a short holiday starting tomorrow, for 10 days. H and I are going on our own. Although we have been away for weekends together this is the first significant break we have had from our children in twenty years (I had a baby already when we moved in together). This is only just starting to sink in.

To be honest I feel a bit like I am losing a limb. They are reaching an age now when I have to let them go, but it is difficult after so many years, such a big chunk of my life, of being responsible for their welfare and safety 24/7. I didn't sleep very well last night, and that is partly due to some deep rooted anxiety at going away from them.

Actually, the reason we have picked these dates is that my daughter is going to Tatarstan for two weeks on a youth trip, mostly paid for by the Russian government. I didn't want to leave her in England, while I was in another country, but she is too old to be dragged along with us. This seemed a good opportunity for us all to get a break we would enjoy.

However, she is off tomorrow morning, flying from Birmingham airport at 3am, and I feel frightened to send my little girl to spend two weeks thousands of miles away. Of course she does not feel worried - she's excited about it, and I think I have managed not to impose my anxiety on her.

I don't know what I will be like in France - perhaps miserable the whole time. I have to be careful that I don't impose my worries on H, who deserves a good break and a rest.

(18 comments | Leave a comment)

June 29th, 2009


05:23 pm - More on The Little Stranger 'what is really going on'
I have just read a handful of reviews of The Little Stranger (a few of them are summarised here) and it's noticeable that some of the reviewers seem to have read the story in quite a different way from me.
some spoilers and opinions )

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

03:41 pm - The Little Stranger
The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters is a ghost story of a dry and indirect kind. I haven't read The Turn of the Screw, but I think it might be along the same lines - is there a ghost? Is there rather a self-replicating mental illness which reflects the social tensions within the house? Or a genetic taint on a family? Or is there a psychic darkness emanating from one disturbed individual, like a nightmare made real? And of course on another level the whole story is a metaphor for the changing power balance between the old 'gentry' and wider post-war society which is moving on ahead of them into the future.

I listened to this on audio, unabridged. The whole thing is about 15-16 hours long. For the first three hours - so a considerable chunk of the book - the emotional tone is very restrained, and frankly almost nothing happens. I had two or three books on the go, and I was dipping into this in breaks from the others, take it or leave it. Then at 3 hours it suddenly ramped up. I can remember, I was walking down Canley Ford, when the whole story suddenly broke open in a shocking event, and I could hardly bear the rising tension. The writing was very controlled and perfectly paced.

A voice reading a story in your ear is very intimate, particularly lying in bed in the dark, and towards the end of the novel, as things become more spooky, I had to sit up and turn the light on because it was insinuating and scary.

I can compare this to her previous 1940s-set book The Night Watch - a step change in improvement in writing quality from her earliest novels, and you feel you are in the hands of a professional who is completely in control of her craft. Having said that people might find it a slow burner, and some might be frustrated that it isn't explicitly one thing or another. Personally I'd like to see it Booker-shortlisted.

Oh, yes, and one more thing. If they put this on telly I'd like to see David Mitchell as the p.o.v. doctor character. I think comedians play horror quite well. Failing that, perhaps Mark Gatiss or one of that clutch.

(Leave a comment)

June 26th, 2009


10:22 am - Rape as reproductive strategy
Many evolutionary psychologists, as I assume you know, have argued that reprehensible as it might be, rape is a positive reproductive strategy. That is, although it is morally wrong, it nevertheless increases a man's chance of passing on his genes to the next generation.

My counter-argument, based just on intuition, was that the reproductive costs of rape outweigh its advantages. In a society without formal legal systems, the families of raped women will kill rapists, and the wider society will shun sexual transgressors (and being shunned is a big deal). There are of course destitute and unprotected women, without family to shelter them, but these women are in no position to raise babies. Destitute women will use abortion and infanticide, and of course lose babies at a much higher rate to disease and famine.

(ETA and there is rape in wars and in clan feuds, but these are not 'good reproductive opportunities' for child survival as we have seen in places like Rwanda. I hate to use these terms, but these are the terms that are used.)

And to be even blunter: reproductive success in humans is not mainly about 'getting women pregnant' because women are not passive receptacles and raising human children takes years of hard work, to which women must consent.

In contrast I think concubinage - keeping young women as extra 'second wives' - is actually a good reproductive strategy, although it's not great for women. So, I'm not all happy clappy saying 'nice things are reproductively successful and nasty things aren't'. Just that one particular nasty thing - rape - is only a good reproductive strategy in male fantasy land.
statistics to back me up )

(19 comments | Leave a comment)

June 25th, 2009


05:37 pm - Ancient music
BBC story: archaeologists have found a musical instrument - a flute carved from a vulture's wing bone - that is 35,000 years old. How amazing. You can hear what the music sounds like here. Ice age music! Of course they don't know the tune, but now they know the notes.

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

04:45 pm - Optical illusion
An extremely powerful optical illusion

You see the blue and green spirals?
Read more... )

(12 comments | Leave a comment)

June 23rd, 2009


01:38 pm - You kids get off my lawn
You often read, on the Internet, a notion that 'property' is a natural or elemental relation between an owner and an object of ownership. This is a founding principle of libertarianism, and underpins distinctively Anglo free market neoliberal economics theory. On the contrary I think ownership is actually a secondary social relation, and has different meanings in different societies (the two main alternatives being pastoral/nomadic and agrarian/imperial I think).

The principle of conservatism is that 'the natural order is the moral order', and thus the uniquely modern state of unmediated ownership is seen as natural, as pre-governmental, as pure - and as the basis of moral order.

My feeling is that modern Anglo notions of ownership arose as a result of the outreach of English-speaking colonialism across the globe. To the colonists the new lands were unowned, as there was no existing social obligation to the savage or barbarous inhabitants. This very new conception of a-social ownership without responsibility has now been turned around to be a primal or natural state, which government and society 'interferes with' in a harmful and unnatural way.

Now there is a new frontier - the Internet - and property here is different again. It is very bound up with social role, kudos, personal reputation. Ownership may be less significant than right attribution. Reproduce my work, but attribute it to my online i-d. It's an utterly different paradigm - almost the reverse of colonialist/capitalist land-stripping.
Read more... )

(20 comments | Leave a comment)

June 19th, 2009


02:24 pm - Erdos xkcd
Did you get today's xkcd? Look at google searches for Erdos today.

Poll #1418071 Erdos
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Did you understand that cartoon?

View Answers

Yes
15 (36.6%)

When I read the alt text
5 (12.2%)

Googled it
8 (19.5%)

No idea
13 (31.7%)


(26 comments | Leave a comment)

June 18th, 2009


04:26 pm - Cats not smart shock
Did you see this report that cats aren't very intelligent? There are plenty of outraged comments on the Guardian there, sternly denying the possibility that this might be so.

Hey - I like cats, but I don't think they are super smart. They are well suited to survival in their native environment, and their body-consciousness is much better developed than humans. I mean their bodily movement is better integrated and flows more gracefully.

In humans supreme grace requires concentration and mental discipline, so perhaps we are tempted to attribute impressive mental powers to cats - but I think for them grace is innate and unconscious. The same goes for horses - daft as brooms but hardwired to move with grace. I don't think they are worse as animals just because they leave abstract cognition to their monkey friends (ie us).

(20 comments | Leave a comment)

June 16th, 2009


05:02 pm - The swallowed land
I have been reading and listening to The Wasteland, so here is a slightly stupid pastiche which doubles as a little bit of Doctor Who fanfic set at the time when he's living as that human schoolmaster, and is visited by an old friend.
Read more... )

(7 comments | Leave a comment)

June 15th, 2009


12:59 pm - Red Cliff
Red Cliff is a Chinese-language (Mandarin?) film from John Woo. It's a huge-scale mediaeval warfare epic. That means you know exactly what you will get: a thousand warships sailing up the Yangtze, heroes fighting off dozens of assailants, the imperial palace with massed ranks of kneeling officials, Tony Leung. And that's what you get. 90% of the film is battle, with occasional interludes of calligraphy, music and rainfall. It's completely by the book. Personally I like this kind of thing, and I expect you know whether you do or not.

I have two complaints - one is that it has no hidden depths of any kind*: it's pretty conventional. The second is that it is about half an hour too long, so it gets repetitive and tedious at the end (IMHO). It's like Hero without the sexual complexity, and hallucinatory oddity.

*OK, maybe a wee little bit of sexual subtext with the commander in chief

(11 comments | Leave a comment)

June 14th, 2009


05:50 pm - Ashes
Thanks to [info]altariel for the link. This is a lovely one hour program by David Mitchell's comedy partner, Robert Webb, speaking about TS Eliot, ee cummings, and Larkin. And he goes to a pub open-mike poetry night! It seems a bit stuffier than ours.

He does it very well, candid and charming. I've sat indoors for an hour to watch this, on a lovely day. I didn't want to stop watching.

(4 comments | Leave a comment)

08:48 am - Mitchell(s) and Webb
While I'm obsessing on politics, here's a great article by David Mitchell in today's Observer. He writes like a dream doesn't he? Modest and yet assertive.

Sir Alan Sugar comes across on TV as exactly the sort of cock who Tory voters like. His brand of "no-nonsense" nonsense and second-hand rhetoric, and his public affirmation that wealth makes what you say more important, are perfectly judged to appeal to the sort of idiot who thinks David Cameron talks a lot of sense, even though all he does is repeatedly bleat "change" like a tramp in a doorway.


And I read in the Guardian interview this week that he still lives in a council flat with a lodger, and he hasn't had a girlfriend for seven years? Ladies of Britain, what the hell are you thinking? Knickers on standby.

Meanwhile, in a shock overthrow of literary convention writer David Mitchell is more conventionally good looking than actor David Mitchell.

BTW - I missed Robert Webb's documentary on poetry last week - I could kick myself, and it isn't on replay any more. How annoying.

(12 comments | Leave a comment)

June 12th, 2009


04:49 pm - More BNP stats
And on the BNP, Daniel links to this polling report which indicates that the BNP is not drawn from disaffected Labour voters, but from the Tory-voting minority within the working class.

If BNP supporters (have parents that vote Labour) are , male working class voters therefore, the natural conclusion that it’s Labour they are taking support from. This falls down, however, on some other questions - asked if they’d rather have Cameron or Brown as PM, BNP voters opt for Cameron by 59% to 17%. Asked to place themselves on the political spectrum they put themselves right of centre, in roughly the same place as they do the Tories. 22% of them think the Tories care about people like themselves, only 6% say the same about Labour. In short, the people the BNP seem to appeal to are actually “working class Tories” - the sort of traditional working class voters who under other circumstances might shift over to the Conservatives.


This is a great relief to me, as I thought these people were Labour supporters gone bad, very bad. This is how it has been presented in the mainstream media.

I should note that the rest of the article indicates that Labour and Tory voters are close together on many anti-BNP-type issues, such as disbelieving in racial inferiority, with BNP supporters radically different from all the mainstream parties, so I'm not saying BNP are 'typical Tories' gone bad either.

(6 comments | Leave a comment)

04:31 pm - If I can shoot rabbits then I can egg fascists
Daniel D at Crooked Timber:

Based on the fact that (the BNP) got two MEPs elected, non-white British citizens might justifiably be looking with suspicion at their white neighbours today, thinking that a significant proportion of us were secretly harbouring fascist sympathies. In fact this isn’t true; the absolute number of BNP votes was slightly down on 2004, and their electoral success was purely an artefact of overall low turnout. It’s therefore an important point to be made, to our own population and to the world’s watching media, that Nick Griffin isn’t in fact a newly popular and influential political figure; he’s a widely reviled creep who not only doesn’t lead a phalanx of jackbooted supporters, but actually can’t even set up for a TV interview without being pelted with eggs. The voice of the British populace does not shout “Hail Griffin!”, it shouts, “Oi Fatty, cop this! [splat]”. And the only efficient and credible way to demonstrate to the world that Griffin is regarded as an eggworthy disgrace, is to actually and repeatedly pelt him with eggs.

I'm not looking for a quote making the opposite case - I'm sure you know what it is - we should not lower ourselves to their level, we should allow the fascists to speak so we can refute them. I take it for granted all lj-friends are anti-racists, so this is just a question of tactics.

Poll #1414851 Egging the BNP
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Throwing eggs at Nick Griffin

View Answers

Good
12 (48.0%)

Bad
13 (52.0%)


(28 comments | Leave a comment)

12:14 pm - The Dudley Locust
A poem I've been working on.
Read more... )

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

June 11th, 2009


04:22 pm - They are playing my song
There's a thread on Yglesias today on 'Songs about People called Alison'. Sometimes spelled wrong. My favourite is the one from Elvis C.

BTW have you noticed that almost all 'mediums' on telly programs are called Alison. No idea why.

ETA This is what I've actually been looking at on youtube this afternoon: some Vincent D'Onofrio videos.

I like the way you move
Mad about the boy
Boy from New York City

They aren't 'really good' like 'really well made and edited videos', just collations, but he's a lovely mover.

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

June 10th, 2009


09:40 am - Uphill all the way
I am quite obsessed by the film Southern Comfort (1981) directed and written by Walter Hill. I think it forms the middle part of a trilogy with The Warriors (1979 - writer/director Hill) and Aliens (1986 - co-written and produced by Hill). All three films have a very specific storyline - a group of beleaguered warriors making their way through hostile territory, being picked off one by one, and the true leader emerging.

The Warriors is based explicitly on Anabasis ('Uphill') by the soldier/writer Xenophon:

Stranded deep in enemy territory, the ... Greek senior officers killed ... Xenophon, one of three remaining leaders elected by the soldiers, played an instrumental role in encouraging the Greek army of 10,000 to march north across foodless deserts and snow-filled mountain passes towards the Black Sea and the comparative security of its Greek shoreline cities. Abandoned in northern Mesopotamia, without supplies other than what they could obtain by force or diplomacy, the 10,000 had to fight their way northwards through Corduene and Armenia, making ad hoc decisions about their leadership, tactics, provender and destiny, while the King's army and hostile natives constantly barred their way and attacked their flanks. Ultimately this "marching republic" managed to reach the shores of the Black Sea at Trebizond, a destination they greeted with their famous cry of joyous exultation on the mountain of Madur in Surmene : "thalatta, thalatta", "the sea, the sea!".


The Warriors depicts a mixed-race street gang fighting their way out of New York. The film is much less subtle in its exploration of the theme than Southern Comfort or Aliens, for example using the names of characters from the Anabasis, and with explicit discussion about 'who should be the war leader?' It is very interesting to me as a missing link joining up the chain of development, but I prefer the two subsequent films which revisit the theme in a more complex way, and they are both very subtexual.

Incidentally I think Star Trek Voyager could have been a much better show if it had followed this template more closely. In fact it ended up being rubbish.

(ETA - for my classicist friends, why I have used 'thalatta' not 'thalassa': that indented text is from from wikpedia which has the note "θαλασσα... Thalatta was the Attic pronunciation")

(9 comments | Leave a comment)

June 8th, 2009


08:21 pm - Ashes to Ashes season finale
I thought Ashes to Ashes has been pretty good lately. I thought last week's episode of Chris on his Via Dolorosa was very well performed. [info]matildabj points out that a 3rd season has been commissioned. Bet Chris dies tonight.

But where next for our favourite Hunt? That article has some ideas
Hastings, 1066: "Stop whining, you've got another eye, haven't you? I've seen worse at a Manchester derby. It stops here; no garlic-chomping froggie pretender is taking over my country. Raymondo, to the shield wall!"

I also like this one from the comments
Side of the LA Freeway 2006: 'Raymondo, have I got heatstroke or did this drunken colonial call me sugar tits?'

Here's one from me:
Walmington on Sea, 1943: 'You tell me to put that light out one more time Hodges, and I'll shove that bike so far up your arse you'll have a handlebar moustache! And no Wilson, I don't think it's terribly wise, so get bloody used to it. Next!'

What else?

(3 comments | Leave a comment)

07:13 pm - What needs to be done
Good article by Sunny Hundal in the Guardian on the election of two BNP ( that's our fascist racist party) MEPs.

It may stop Labour ignoring its traditional working-class origins, now so comprehensively stomped over that they're migrating to other parties in droves. This is not an indictment of high immigration and multiculturalism, as no doubt some will call it, but of a centralised party ignoring local concerns. As Sarah Ditum points out, our media tell people every day that their crumbling infrastructure is the fault of those dastardly asylum seekers (rather than lack of investment, which might mean higher taxes). Immigration wouldn't be such a big issue if local councils presented information more quickly about population movements, so resources could be poured in or taken out in response, ensuring local public services didn't suffer. This is also a result of the lack of investment in social housing.


I agree with him that ultimately human social values will render fascism impotent:

Most people have enough contact with someone of an ethnic minority to know how stupid racism is. That personal knowledge will always override whatever the BNP says.


I also agree with Dan here that

Renewal is therefore the order of the day, and already last night the left was out in force – Nick Brown talking down the privatisation of Royal Mail, Michael Meacher talking up social housing, and, er, Polly Toynbee being Polly Toynbee... whatever the details of policy, going back to core values, back to the party’s roots in an electorate which has abandoned them (and yet who have not sided with the Tories in doing so), is what needs to happen.


And here's my instinct about yesterday. It feels to me like when your partner has made you very angry, and you eventually say something so hurtful and spiteful that you shock yourself, and you see how much it has hurt him/her, and then now that you have done the worst you can, you can begin a process of reconciliation. They needed to suffer really badly. But will that be enough now?

(10 comments | Leave a comment)

> previous 20 entries
> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com